Pasterz konsensusu

Posted by: pak4 on: 4 kwietnia, 2022

• In: Uncategorized
• Dodaj komentarz

Peer Review We are all equals and equally able to review code and accept it to the project. We learn from one another and do our best work when we know our peers will be judging it later.

Automated Gatekeeper Our code has test coverage. We trust our tests and only submit work we know will pass a comprehensive test suite. Typically we ask for a second opinion before the code is pushed into the test suite (for automated deployment).

Consensus Shepherd Our community of coders is vigilant, and opinionated. We require consensus from interested parties before code can be marked as reviewed by the community. We may also have a testbot that is part of our community, making it easier for human coders to know when a suggested change meets minimum standards.

Benevolent Dictator My code, my way. You are welcome to submit your suggestions, but I will review or have my lieutenants review your work with a fine-tooth comb. I enjoy finding your mistakes and rejecting your work. Only perfection is good enough.

Westby, Emma Jane Hogbin. Git for Teams . O’Reilly Media. Kindle Edition.